API development
Build REST or GraphQL APIs with TypeScript types shared across the request and response boundary, reducing an entire class of integration bugs before they reach testing.
Node.js Development
Node.js where the ecosystem and I/O model fit the problem.
Node.js and TypeScript backend development for APIs, real-time systems, and services that benefit from a large ecosystem and an async-first runtime.
Book a discovery callTHE BUSINESS NEED
Start with the problem.
Build what matters.
Node.js is a strong fit for I/O-bound services, real-time features, and teams that already work in TypeScript across frontend and backend — but only when the code is structured with the same discipline you'd expect anywhere else: explicit error handling, typed boundaries, and a clear separation between business logic and framework code.
How we approach it
We structure Node.js services with explicit layers — request handling, business logic, and data access kept separate — so the codebase stays testable as it grows, rather than accumulating logic directly in route handlers. TypeScript strictness, error typing, and input validation are treated as required, not optional, since untyped boundaries are where Node.js codebases usually degrade.
CAPABILITY IN DETAIL
What this means in practice.
Specific engineering work, connected to a business need.
Real-time systems
Implement WebSocket or server-sent event architectures with explicit reconnection, backpressure, and message-ordering behavior for live dashboards, chat, or notification features.
Background jobs and queues
Design job processing with retry limits, exponential backoff, and dead-letter queues so failures are visible and recoverable instead of silently dropped.
Full-stack TypeScript
Share types between a Node.js backend and a TypeScript frontend where the project structure supports it, keeping API contracts enforced by the compiler rather than documentation alone.
WHERE IT CAN HELP
Problems worth solving.
Illustrative engagement types, not claims about previous projects.
- An API layer for a product whose frontend team already works in TypeScript
- Real-time features like live updates, chat, or collaborative editing
- I/O-heavy services — webhooks, integrations, and orchestration — where Node's async model fits naturally
BEFORE WE BEGIN
Questions, answered.
Node.js or Go — how do you decide?
We look at the workload and the team. CPU-bound or highly concurrent processing tends to favor Go; I/O-bound services, real-time features, and teams already using TypeScript often fit better with Node.js. We're explicit about that trade-off rather than defaulting to one.
Do you use a specific framework?
Framework choice depends on the project's needs and existing stack — we're not tied to one, and we discuss the trade-offs of the options that fit your constraints.
How do you keep a growing Node.js codebase maintainable?
Strict TypeScript configuration, layered architecture that separates business logic from route handlers, and test coverage on the logic that actually carries risk.
LET’S BUILD WHAT’S NEXT
Have a complex
technology problem?
Bring the idea to a focused 15-minute call. No pitch deck, no obligation — just a clear read on whether we’re the right fit.